Problem-Solving Workshops | Beyond Intractability


problem solving workshops

Problem solving workshops for dog owners with challenging dog behaviors, featuring Sean O'Shea of The Good Dog Training and Rehabilitation and Ashley Smentek of Gold Hill Canine. Collaborative problem-solving. Ideation (or "idea generation") workshops bring diverse people and organizations together to solve challenges — such as reaching hard-to-count populations — through a series of creative problem solving exercises. What are Problem Solving Workshops? Problem solving workshops are discussions that take place between unofficial representatives of groups or states engaged in violent protracted conflict.[1] Carefully chosen representatives from all sides meet with a third party panel to analyze the fundamental sources of conflict and develop possible solutions.

My Workshop Structure for Creative Problem Solving |

Donations are not now providing the minimal funding needed to maintain and develop BI. While we work hard to keep costs down, problem solving workshops still need your financial support.

We need your financial support. Problem solving workshops are discussions that take place between unofficial representatives of groups or states engaged in violent protracted conflict. Panelists are typically academic researchers or conflict scholars who arrange for the representatives to gather together for an intensive discussion. The workshops do not replace official diplomatic activities, but act as a complement to them.

Workshops provide an informal, low-risk, noncommittal forum in which unofficial representatives of the parties can analyze their conflict and engage in problem solving. Participants exchange ideas, recognize key obstacles, and explore new problem solving workshops. The process does not involve negotiation nor does it require disputants to give up their struggle.

Rather than bargaining from entrenched positions, participants engage in an academic exercise in which they jointly explore their common problem, problem solving workshops. Workshops are usually facilitated by a panel of social science scholars who have theoretical knowledge about the causes, dynamics, problem solving workshops, and effects of conflict.

In the process of offering their technical expertise, they learn more about social and political processes of conflict, problem solving workshops. Party representatives should truly represent all strands of opinions within the adversary groups and provide insight into the party's range of feelings, perceptions, and aspirations about the issues in conflict.

Those groups directly involved in the conflict must have a voice in determining which viewpoints are to be represented in the workshop. It is also important that participants from the various sides display roughly equal levels of skill, experience, and knowledge. If there is a great imbalance with respect to the participants' intellectual and analytical capacities, the exercise is far less likely to be a success.

Workshops do not begin with a detailed agenda. Instead, problem solving workshops, they should be problem solving workshops and run as research seminars that have an open agenda to be shaped by the participants, problem solving workshops.

Other common topics include matters of trust, how to reduce tension, and what confidence building measures or de-escalation tactics would be effective, problem solving workshops. In the first phase, each of the participants should explain their view of the conflict to the problem solving workshops. Because parties typically avoid direct communication with each other at this point, most exchanges take place between one party and the panel.

There may be provocative challenges and indignant rebuttals, making this stage of the workshop especially emotionally charged. Therefore, presentations should be as free from interruption and debate as possible. Eventually participants may become frustrated and feel that they are talking in circles and getting nowhere. At this point, panelists should try to provide some bridge into a second and more productive stage of the workshop.

In the second phase, the parties maintain their separate spheres but begin to join the panel in analysis. They begin to thoroughly discuss the various accounts of the conflict that have been given. This process involves a rigorous analysis of the structure of the dispute and invites participants from all sides to explore the nature of their conflict. They also introduce relevant general theories about why conflicts occur or problem solving workshops parallels to conflicts in other parts of the world, problem solving workshops.

Eventually participants begin to correct what the panelists have to say about conflict theory and something that resembles an academic seminar begins to take place, problem solving workshops. Together, the panelists and representatives analyze the conflict, explore mutual perspectives, and generate new ideas.

In the third phase, the group becomes somewhat more integrated and representatives from the opposing sides begin to collaborate. They invite the parties to explore the central issues of their conflict and search for solutions that do not require any of the parties to compromise their basic interests or needs.

However, the participants typically realize that initial prescriptions must be rejected in virtue of theoretical considerations and likely negative consequences, problem solving workshops. At this point, the participants have developed a strong understanding of what the obstacles to resolution are. Once they have come to recognize just how small the area of possible initial agreement is, they must focus on this tiny area and try to expand it.

For example, they may sketch out a series of de-escalating moves to be presented to decision makers. Because a single workshop is unlikely to include all the relevant parties or deal with all problem solving workshops issues, a series of meetings may be necessary. However, even a single workshop can create new opportunities for communication between groups of antagonists. The scholar-practitioners who oversee the sessions play both a facilitative and diagnostic role.

They invite participants from all sides to engage in an analysis of their conflict and work together to develop creative ideas for its improvement. Because both sets of participants trust the third party, they are able to proceed with the assurance that their interests will be served and their needs respected.

Because the central issues often go beyond those portrayed in the parties' public positions, consultants must listen for hidden agendas and unacknowledged resentments.

For example, one commonly used body of material has to do with the tendency of conflicts to escalate. Exposing parties to this body of knowledge can help them to identify the ways in which they are contributing to escalation. If used constructively, theories about the causes and processes of conflict have the potential to generate new ideas for the participants and stimulate productive discussion.

Third parties also facilitate communication among the conflicting parties so that mutually acceptable solutions can emerge. Panelists try to help the participants establish "a flow of communication" that will enable them to find their own way towards resolution, problem solving workshops. Often the academic context is helpful in providing the context, norms, and interventions necessary for constructive communication.

This context suggests an analytic, cooperative approach that calls for direct, face-to-face interaction. Consultation should be distinguished from other intermediary functions, such as mediation, arbitration, and adjudication. Since participants in problem solving workshops are unofficial, they cannot make decisions or problem solving workshops any one in the group to a particular course of action.

They can, however, work with the other parties and the facilitators to explore multiple options, and may develop one or more suggested approaches or creative ideas which they can present to official decision makers after the workshop concludes. While other forms of third party intervention, such as mediation or arbitration, lead to the settlement of conflict, such settlements may not be stable in the long run.

This is because even if a settlement is reached, such settlements often focus solely on material interests and ignore the underlying needs of the adversaries, which remain unmet, problem solving workshops. In problem solving workshops, on the other hand, scholars help disputants to jointly analyze the fundamental sources of conflict, focusing on unmet human needs such as identity and security. Rather than reaching a settlement, problem solving workshops, based on interests, the two central objectives of problem solving workshops are the analysis of conflict and its ultimate resolution.

Therefore, workshops aim to produce new ideas, altered perceptions, and innovative solutions. Some workshops are primarily educational and focus on changing people's perceptions and attitudes. This provides participants with new knowledge and abilities that enable them to function better in their conflict-torn societies.

Other workshops are more political, and emphasize transferring the new knowledge to decision-making bodies. Parties caught in deep conflict often view their conflict as win-lose and are unlikely to collaborate.

Adversaries typically interact in a legalistic, problem solving workshops, accusatory atmosphere where it is difficult for them to learn anything about each other or themselves.

They express the grievances of their group, proclaim their rights, and defend their positions. Often they do so in a militant way. There are few attempts to really listen to those from the other side and gain an understanding of their perspective. Such interactions typically enforce already rigid positions and negative problem solving workshops of the other side. Workshops are designed to create a setting governed by a different set of norms, in which more productive interaction between the adversaries can take place.

Analysis gives parties tools to reinterpret their relationship, enlarges their view of the situation, and breaks down their former categories of thought.

These interactions should enable the parties to discover new ways to influence each other by exploring what problem solving workshops other needs. Some theorists also stress the idea that problem solving should produce significant changes in the parties' attitudes towards one another. Nevertheless, these attitudes also tend to become better understood.

Problem solving workshops solving should be an exercise in realism, helping parties to better understand one another despite their continued opposition. But workshops not only contribute to the transformation and resolution of conflict, but also produce valuable research, analysis, and insights. These new ideas can then be transferred to the policy arena and influence individuals' future political activity. In some cases, workshop participants act as advisors to the decision makers and political leadership within their own communities.

Non-official but highly influential participants are often most effective because they increase the likelihood that what is learned in the workshop will have an impact on the policy process. In many instances, workshops also prepare the parties for more formal communication processes and supplement problem solving workshops negotiations.

In the post-negotiation phase, they can facilitate coexistence and cooperation and contribute to reconciliation. Fisher, "Interactive Conflict Resolution," pp. William Zartman and J.

Lewis Rasmussen. Washington, D. Martin's Press, Use the following problem solving workshops cite this article: Maiese, Michelle, problem solving workshops. Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess.

Our inability to constructively handle intractable conflict is the most serious, and the most neglected, problem facing humanity. Solving today's tough problems depends upon finding better ways of dealing with these conflicts. Educators Consider a low-cost BI-based custom text. Constructive Conflict Initiative. Join Us in calling for a dramatic expansion of efforts to limit the destructiveness of intractable conflict. Practical things we can all do to limit the destructive conflicts threatening our future.

A free, open, online seminar exploring new approaches for addressing difficult and intractable conflicts. Major topic areas include:. Massively Parallel Peacebuilding. Authoritarian Populism, problem solving workshops. Constructive Confrontation. Links to thought-provoking articles exploring the larger, societal dimension of intractability.

Content may not be reproduced without prior written permission.


Inspect and Adapt – Scaled Agile Framework


problem solving workshops


This is a suite of creative problem solving tools from Erik op ten Berg - an expert in creative thinking from the Netherlands. His creative problem solving process takes a challenge and finds ideas that are new, useful and meaningful. I guarantee you these activities will . All first-year Harvard Law School students take the Problem Solving Workshop in the winter term. A uniquely structured offering, the Problem Solving Workshop bridges the gap between academic study and practical lawyering. From off-site core curriculum workshops to highly customized skills development services delivered on-site, Kepner-Tregoe is the world leader in providing problem solving services and problem solving training. Click to find out more about our Problem Solving workshops.